Comments on: Who’s in and Who’s out! http://natebettger.com/2008/10/15/whos-in-and-whos-out/ Building bridges, connecting community, village alchemy . Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:42:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Erik Dungan http://natebettger.com/2008/10/15/whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-498 Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:59:26 +0000 http://natebettger.wordpress.com/?p=422#comment-498 Same message–Christ crucified and risen–without superfluous religion and relevant to today’s generation.

]]> By: darrenbrett http://natebettger.com/2008/10/15/whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-497 Sun, 19 Oct 2008 03:46:50 +0000 http://natebettger.wordpress.com/?p=422#comment-497 I’d say this is one of those polls, like most polls actually, that seem to be lacking in nuance. Questions of “message” and “delivery” are more complicated, multi-facted, and interconnected than is suggested by the options described here.

Also, the options provided are so wide-open as to have three different people click off the same selection, and mean three completely different things by doing so.

This is why I’ve always preferred essays to multiple-choice tests; they’re just so much more like real life. :)

]]> By: Nate http://natebettger.com/2008/10/15/whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-494 Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:00:28 +0000 http://natebettger.wordpress.com/?p=422#comment-494 Hehe… bob! we only have two votes so far! But there have been 28 hits to the page… so indifference is the running assumption…

]]> By: bob Pearson http://natebettger.com/2008/10/15/whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-493 Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:57:45 +0000 http://natebettger.wordpress.com/?p=422#comment-493 So we have 100% voting or both a new message and a new delivery. That seems to settle it…:)

]]>