<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journeying together</title>
	<atom:link href="http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/</link>
	<description>Building bridges, connecting community, village alchemy                                                                 .</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:42:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 21:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m definitely with you on that one, Bob.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m definitely with you on that one, Bob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob Pearson</title>
		<link>http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 21:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But I think it is more important to state your position clearly so the other knows where you stand than to be passive aggressive and not tell them but still try to be in relationship.  I think this can create false relationships, not better ones.  It is no only ok to disagree with someone and still be in close loving relationship, but I think it is essential since we are not all alike and will always disagree on some things.

The Presbyterian church is having this argument over gay ordination, where we are being asked to agree to disagree and get on with loving each other.  Some are all for this and others think they must remove themselves from this conversation.  I am beginning to have less sympathy for this &quot;think like me or at least don&#039;t try to make me think like you or I cannot remain in relationship with you.&quot;  Diversity of ideas, thoughts, passionate stands and other world views is a good thing and needs to be fostered not avoided.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I think it is more important to state your position clearly so the other knows where you stand than to be passive aggressive and not tell them but still try to be in relationship.  I think this can create false relationships, not better ones.  It is no only ok to disagree with someone and still be in close loving relationship, but I think it is essential since we are not all alike and will always disagree on some things.</p>
<p>The Presbyterian church is having this argument over gay ordination, where we are being asked to agree to disagree and get on with loving each other.  Some are all for this and others think they must remove themselves from this conversation.  I am beginning to have less sympathy for this &#8220;think like me or at least don&#8217;t try to make me think like you or I cannot remain in relationship with you.&#8221;  Diversity of ideas, thoughts, passionate stands and other world views is a good thing and needs to be fostered not avoided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 14:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Granted, we need boundaries. I am all for that. But lines in the sand are not just boundaries. They are lines that say I&#039;m on this side and you are on that side. We cannot walk together. We cannot go forward together. If this is our attitude towards those who think, act, theologize differently than us... there will be no reconciliation on earth. 

We will not be lost in the desert without the lines. At the least, we will not be alone. At the best, we will have more people who collectively have a better understanding of where we are going.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted, we need boundaries. I am all for that. But lines in the sand are not just boundaries. They are lines that say I&#8217;m on this side and you are on that side. We cannot walk together. We cannot go forward together. If this is our attitude towards those who think, act, theologize differently than us&#8230; there will be no reconciliation on earth. </p>
<p>We will not be lost in the desert without the lines. At the least, we will not be alone. At the best, we will have more people who collectively have a better understanding of where we are going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 14:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heidi and I were talking and she made a comment that I found interesting:

&quot;If we never draw lines in the sand then we are just lost in the dessert.&quot;

Thoughts?

Greg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heidi and I were talking and she made a comment that I found interesting:</p>
<p>&#8220;If we never draw lines in the sand then we are just lost in the dessert.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
<p>Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: writetools</title>
		<link>http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[writetools]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it is okay to challenge people to step out of their comfort zones. I think we need to love those that come into our fellowship the way they are, but love them enough to help them grow. Sometimes that requires stepping on toes, but if you can&#039;t be real and honest with the ones you grow together with, then the relationship at it&#039;s core needs work. The gospel by nature was offensive to a lot of it&#039;s hearers... sometimes that is what is needed to grow...to produce fruit you have to prune and caretake. It&#039;s often painful...but productive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is okay to challenge people to step out of their comfort zones. I think we need to love those that come into our fellowship the way they are, but love them enough to help them grow. Sometimes that requires stepping on toes, but if you can&#8217;t be real and honest with the ones you grow together with, then the relationship at it&#8217;s core needs work. The gospel by nature was offensive to a lot of it&#8217;s hearers&#8230; sometimes that is what is needed to grow&#8230;to produce fruit you have to prune and caretake. It&#8217;s often painful&#8230;but productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Picking my battles… the nuance of conflict &#171; Life by Nate</title>
		<link>http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Picking my battles… the nuance of conflict &#171; Life by Nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and how we stay in community together. Greg and I have been having a conversation in the comments here, and I think it makes for an important [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and how we stay in community together. Greg and I have been having a conversation in the comments here, and I think it makes for an important [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg, 
I love your thoughts... and our conversation last night was golden. I have learned so much talking to Kyle and others who have been pained by the church. I want to comment on your middle paragraph there. 

I wonder if it&#039;s possible to get to a point that no matter what people say or do (even in regards to things that we hold most dear... church), we are not offend or hurt by them. I say by them because what if their pain becomes our pain rather than us feeling as though they are hurting us. After all it is their experience or perceptions and we cannot tell them it is not true. It is what it is for them. We can look at the present situation and move forward from there. Walking the journey.... together. 

Remember when you and I were talking and I said I hope to show people that there must be no drawing lines in the sand? There is no end to our fellowship or to our love. It just keeps going. When we commit to the relationship, to the journey, its ok to disagree. 

I have also been thinking about picking my battles. Now I might be able to learn how to say things that offend in a different way that is not offensive (questions, wonderings, etc) because I know that someone may not have the capacity to continue on in relationship that I wish they had. I know, though, that I am committed to this thing, and that they cannot offend me, so I do not censer them in any way. When people are at a point of not being offended by what i think, they will know that they can ask and I will tell them. It&#039;s more nuanced for me than simply saying what I think or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,<br />
I love your thoughts&#8230; and our conversation last night was golden. I have learned so much talking to Kyle and others who have been pained by the church. I want to comment on your middle paragraph there. </p>
<p>I wonder if it&#8217;s possible to get to a point that no matter what people say or do (even in regards to things that we hold most dear&#8230; church), we are not offend or hurt by them. I say by them because what if their pain becomes our pain rather than us feeling as though they are hurting us. After all it is their experience or perceptions and we cannot tell them it is not true. It is what it is for them. We can look at the present situation and move forward from there. Walking the journey&#8230;. together. </p>
<p>Remember when you and I were talking and I said I hope to show people that there must be no drawing lines in the sand? There is no end to our fellowship or to our love. It just keeps going. When we commit to the relationship, to the journey, its ok to disagree. </p>
<p>I have also been thinking about picking my battles. Now I might be able to learn how to say things that offend in a different way that is not offensive (questions, wonderings, etc) because I know that someone may not have the capacity to continue on in relationship that I wish they had. I know, though, that I am committed to this thing, and that they cannot offend me, so I do not censer them in any way. When people are at a point of not being offended by what i think, they will know that they can ask and I will tell them. It&#8217;s more nuanced for me than simply saying what I think or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggbolt16</title>
		<link>http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ggbolt16]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 07:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natebettger.com/2008/05/21/journeying-together/#comment-286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it is important to be sensitive to people, however, I think that only goes so far.  If we are constantly on eggshells afraid that we might offend someone we never get to learn anything about one another, thus never achieving a deeper and more meaningful level of community.  

If we can&#039;t be in fellowship with one another even after we find out that something that the other holds dear has caused us pain (i.e. church) then we are just a bunch of like-minded people (not a good thing in my opinion).  

If we truly are interested in being community we must be able to be with those that we disagree with the most.

Blessings,
Greg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is important to be sensitive to people, however, I think that only goes so far.  If we are constantly on eggshells afraid that we might offend someone we never get to learn anything about one another, thus never achieving a deeper and more meaningful level of community.  </p>
<p>If we can&#8217;t be in fellowship with one another even after we find out that something that the other holds dear has caused us pain (i.e. church) then we are just a bunch of like-minded people (not a good thing in my opinion).  </p>
<p>If we truly are interested in being community we must be able to be with those that we disagree with the most.</p>
<p>Blessings,<br />
Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

